1. Who is the developer of Time-Machine?

My name is Greg Kolodziejzyk, and I am the developer of Time-Machine. Time-Machine combines artificial intelligence with my own time tested method to make intuitive predictions about future events.

Read more about my research here.

Summary here.

 

2. How does Time-Machine predict the future?

 

Imagine you're trying to guess the outcome of a coin flip tomorrow: heads or tails. 

 

Instead of guessing the flip directly, you use hidden (invisible to you) pictures to help you make your prediction.

 

• If the coin is going to land on heads, there will be a picture of a hamburger shown to you.

 

• If it's going to land on tails, there will be a picture of a ice cream cone shown to you.

 

Not knowing the contents of either image, your challenge is to imagine (remote view) the picture that will be shown to you tomorrow. The picture that will be shown to you is based on the coin's outcome. If you believe you “see” elements of a hamburger in your imagination, you'll predict the coin will be heads. If you "see" elements if ice cream, you'll predict tails.

 

This idea of making intuitive predictions by “viewing” or focusing on associated objects or images, rather than the actual event or target itself is called “Associative Remote Viewing”. Scientific experiments have shown that there is a statistically significant effect, but it is VERY VERY small. The Time-Machine app uses repetition to form a consensus, along with some proprietary artificial intelligence technology that significantly increases confidence in your predictions.

 

3. What kinds of predictions does Time-Machine make?

 

One of many steps in our decision making process is the consideration of intuitive predictions. The Time-Machine web app was developed to allow us to crowdsource these intuitive predictions about various future forecasts. The actual predictions vary from questions with 100% probability like: "will the sun rise tomorrow morning", to questions that are considered quantum random events like the outcome of a coin flip, to other more important questions where a predicted outcome would be considered useful.

 

5. How do you "remote view"? (How do you ‘see’ something you haven’t seen yet?)

 

The process of “remote viewing” is personal, and can vary from person to person. Generally, I find it most useful to close my eyes and relax, reaching a meditative state. Then I imagine that I am looking at an image on my computer screen in the future after the predicted event has transpired. Since it is impossible to know anything about the image you will be shown, as they are chosen from a library of over 100,000 random images, your brain can’t become involved in the process, and you have to listen to your subconscious mind. I try to clear my mind so that I’m not thinking of anything at all, and imaging looking around an image on my screen, waiting for some random thought to enter my mind. 

 

The valuable impressions always arrive in your mind as a surprise, where you might wonder how you ever could have generated that thought which seemingly came from nowhere. Often, these valid impressions about the photo are very weak thoughts that seem to be occurring in the ‘background’ of your mind. Pay attention to these weak random background thoughts, as they are often related to your target.

 

Please keep in mind that the amount of concentrated, focused effort you invest into a good quality remote viewing session is directly correlated to a successful trial. Taking your time to get into a meditative state is highly recommended. Sometimes I listen to Hemi-Sync sound to help me relax and clear my mind. Search for “Hemi-Sync” on Spotify. 

​

6. Are there some tips that will increase my prediction success?

​

Based on our research so far, I can make 3 suggestions:

​

1. Spend MORE time rather than LESS time remote viewing each trial. Don't rush it. Take your time, Take time to fully relax and clear your mind before starting. Our research has found that success rate increases with the amount of time spent in a meditative state while remote viewing a trial.

​

2. Similar to the above suggestion, we have found that longer RV descriptions about the hidden photo are more likely to be accurate rather than short descriptions. 1 or 2 words is not as good as a dozen words, or a sentence or two, Again, spending time remote viewing seems to correlate with success.

​

3. PAY ATTENTION when you view the hidden photo after the future event has completed. This is important. Our research has found that if you spend time looking at the revealed image, and carefully compare your remote viewing transcript to the photo noting how close you came to describing some element of the photo, then your performance significantly INCREASES.

​

7. Do you financially compensate experiment participants?​

​

YES! If you have been rewarded with a work contract from time-machine.com, and have not previously participated in the project, then we will pay you for your first 10 predictions. ​

​

8. I have completed my 10 predictions and want to do more. Will I be rehired?​

​

If you are interested in participating in another 10 predictions after your first set of 10 is complete, take a 5 day break, and make a request to be rehired here:

 

https://app.time-machine.com/apply_rehires

​

9. Is there scientific evidence that remote viewing is real?

 

Aside from my own research, YES! According to a META study conducted by Dr. Dean Radin, a summary of all remote viewing experiments conducted by universities and research organizations, showed an astounding overall effect size (objective method of evaluating experiment results as compared to what could be expected by chance) that resulted in odds against chance of ten million to one. Some individual studies actually resulted in odds against chance of over 100 billion to one. The META study summarized the results of over 5.5 million individual trials that spanned the last century.

 

According to Professor Jessica Utts, a statistician from the University of California, in a report assessing the statistical evidence for psychic functioning requested by Congress and the CIA, “It is clear to this author that anomalous cognition is possible and has been demonstrated. This conclusion is not based on belief, but rather on commonly accepted scientific criteria. The phenomenon has been replicated in a number of forms across laboratories and cultures.” And regarding continuing research, she adds “I believe that it would be wasteful of valuable resources to continue to look for proof. No one who has examined all of the data across laboratories, taken as a collective whole, has been able to suggest methodological or statistical problems to explain the ever-increasing and consistent results to date.”

 

I’ve been involved as a researcher in this field for over 30 years, and I know many of the top researchers personally as well as many of the U.S. military remote viewers (various U.S. intelligence agencies explored using remote viewing for intelligence gathering in a 20-year, $20 million basic research program). These are upstanding, highly educated individuals who are motivated to further our collective understanding of this mysterious, yet fascinating field. Read this link for a review of all remote viewing research including the US government programs.

 

Unfortunately, despite all of the scientific evidence, skeptics still refer to remote viewing as a pseudoscience. Throughout history, there have been numerous instances where widely held beliefs were later overturned by more evidence or new discoveries. Instances such as widespread belief that the world was flat remind us that scientific understanding is ever-evolving. What we accept as truth today might be refined or even overturned as new evidence comes to light.

​

10. Is there scientific evidence that Time-Machine.com project is predicting the future?

​

YES! As of March, 2025, and more than 200,000 trials conducted by over 3000 paid research participants from around the world, we have achieved a statistically significant result of z = 2.7 (z = 1.8 is considered chance) proving that it is possible to retrieve 1 bit of information from the future.​